Markdown vs HTML: A Writer’s Perspective ποΈ
As a writer who publishes content on the web, I’ve worked extensively with both Markdown and HTML. Over the years, I’ve developed a deep appreciation for the unique strengths and use cases of each format. In this post, I want to share my personal experiences and insights to help you understand when to use Markdown vs HTML in your own writing.
What is Markdown? π
Markdown is a lightweight markup language that allows you to write content in a simple, readable format that can easily be converted to HTML. With Markdown, you use plain text symbols to indicate formatting, like using asterisks to make text *italic* or double asterisks to make it **bold**.
I love using Markdown for writing drafts because it lets me focus purely on my content without getting distracted by complex formatting tags. It’s incredibly intuitive – I can knock out a draft with headings, links, lists and more in minutes, without my fingers ever leaving the keyboard.
The Power of HTML πͺ
While Markdown is great for simplicity, sometimes you need the full power and flexibility of HTML. With HTML, you have precise control over every aspect of formatting and can create more complex page structures.
I turn to HTML whenever I’m creating a final published piece and want to refine the formatting and layout. Things like tables, embedded media, custom CSS classes, meta tags for SEO, and multi-column layouts require the power tools that only HTML can provide.
HTML is also essential when I’m building out full web pages or templates beyond just the main content area. Navigation menus, footers, sidebars, and other page furniture are all squarely in the domain of HTML.
Choosing the Right Tool for the Job π οΈ
So when should you use Markdown vs HTML? In my experience, the answer comes down to the purpose and context of what you’re writing.
I recommend Markdown whenever:
– You want to focus purely on writing without worrying about formatting
– You’re writing something that will eventually be converted to HTML anyway
– You need to collaborate with others using a simple, universal format
– You’re jotting notes, brainstorming ideas, or writing quick drafts
I recommend HTML whenever:
– You need full control over the structure and presentation of your content
– You’re building complete web pages, not just authoring content
– You want to optimize for search engines using meta tags, structured data, etc.
– You need to include elements not supported by Markdown like tables, iframes, or custom styling
The Best of Both Worlds π
Luckily, we don’t always have to choose between Markdown and HTML. Many platforms, like WordPress, Ghost, and static site generators support Markdown content with embedded HTML. This allows us to write the bulk of our posts in simple Markdown, but add in HTML when we need more flexibility. It’s the best of both worlds!
Over time, I’ve settled into a workflow that leverages the strengths of each format:
1. Outline and draft content in Markdown to move quickly and focus on the writing itself
2. Convert to HTML for final formatting, layout, and publishing
3. Embed small HTML snippets into mostly-Markdown files when needed for tricky elements

π― Conclusion π
Markdown and HTML are both essential tools in a web writer’s toolkit. Markdown excels for writing and collaboration, while HTML provides the power and flexibility to build complete web pages. By understanding the strengths of each, you can choose the right format for the task at hand and combine them together when needed.
I hope sharing my own perspective and workflow has given you some new insight into when and how to use Markdown vs HTML in your writing. Give both a try and discover what works best for you. Happy writing! βοΈ
Leave a Reply